I LOVE Pantene products! I normally use the Frizzy to Smooth line because I do have kinda thick hair and I color it at home. On a side note, I haven't colored my hair in 6wks. I was given the opportunity to try the Nature Fusion for free. I think it's great that they decided to be more "green" with their bottling. More companies should follow their lead. On the down side, I wasn't happy with this product. The smell is great, but I felt it stripped my hair of it's natural oils somewhat. Very dry and tangled. I give 2 stars because it smelled nice. I think someone with not so thick normal hair would love this shampoo.

The shampoo smelled AMAZING and had nice thick texture.Was alittle hard to completely rinse from hair and made hair feel almost tangled after rinsing.Now I remember why I switched to tresseme for my ahir care products.

The positive: This is the best Pantene Shampoo I've tried to date. My hair seems clean and easy to style, where as the other Pantene shampoos I've used have left my hair feeling oily and dirtier than it was before I washed it. And Kudos to Pantene for making strides in more responsible packaging - it's a step in the right direction. That being said, unfortunately I couldn't give more stars to this product because I feel very strongly that products should not be using a "natural" label when the product ingredients are anything but natural or healthy. There are too many chemicals in this product in order to hold a name that implies it's a natural product. "Nature Fusion" is misleading to consumers. I'd love to see a product from Pantene similar to this, but without SLS, artificial colors, and other harmful ingredients.

It has a great smell and it is awesome that they are looking for alternatives to plastic. However, just because this alternative was used is not enough to label as natural. This product leaves my hair smelling great BUT it also leaves my scalp and hair very dry.

I did not care for this shampoo. It left my hair feeling greasy and flat. It also made my hair more difficult to style. I've pulled my hair back in a pony tail more times while using this shampoo than I have in a year. I am happy they are being more environmentally friendly with the new bottle but I still don't like the standard cap, they always stick.

I do not think I will be purchasing this product. Yes, it did make my hair shiny and smell nice, but as far as frizz control, big fat no. My hair did not feel healthy and from what I can see there has been no improvement in the condition of my hair period. I believe this Pantene to be really no different for me compared to the other formulas, I purchase Pantene only when there is a really good sale and I am low on cash. I thought that this formula would be different, seems all the same to me.

I tried the shampoo and conditioner and did not like the way my hair felt after, it felt like it left a residue and my hair felt heavier. I like alot of the other pantene products I have used in the past and although this one is eco friendly and all natural i would not buy again

LOVED the scent but I have very high maintenance hair and this is not the right product to use. I'll stick to my all natural products.

not able to use pantene in the past due to the residue it left on my hair was hoping this new formula was different ... still not able to my hair was greasy my 12

I'm sorry, but I do not like this shampoo or the conditioner for that matter. It has a nice smell, consistency, and great packaging for the environment. However, it strips my hair of moisture. I was only able to stand using the product for 4 days before I had to switch back to my regular stuff. My hair is high lighted, so I am sure that plays a part. My hair had so many frizzy fly-away pieces, lost some of its shine, and the softness was dramatically reduced. I even felt like my scalp was so much dryer. If you don't have color treated hair, try it. But I pay too much money to have a product like this wreak havoc on my hair.

The name "Nature Fusion" implies that the shampoo is chem-free/organic. I feel like Suave has mislead us to believe the product is all natural. While the packaging is environmentally friendly the product itself is not. The shampoo contains sulphates that many feel are damaging. Deceptive marketing? One star for packaging, Zero for product.

Was really happy that Pantene is making an effort to be more environmentally-friendly with their bottles, but still not a big fan of the ingredients in the actual shampoo. Other companies are using healthier ingredients and as a major company, P&G could be helping to lead the way for mainstream products to get healthy too. Scent was too strong, but it lathered well.

Again, kudos to the plant-based bottle. However, your "natural" nature-fusion campaign isn't a natural product. Sodium laureth sulfate? A nature-based shampoo wouldn't include this ingredient. Yellow 5 and Orange 4 could be replaced with natural colors or omitted entirely. A natural fragrance would be my choice over a chemical additive. Why are there multiple surfactants in this product?

I really don't like the shampoo because it gives my hair a funky texture. My hair isn't soft.

This shampoo earns 1 star on scent alone, it smells divine! But beyond that, I wasn't really impressed. I have very fine (but thick), straight hair that gets greasy quickly with no coloring or other processing. The shampoo by itself left my hair feeling totally stripped. Once dry, my hair felt good (after using the conditioner), but looked dull and lifeless and seemed to have more trouble with sticky-outy bits than usual. On the "future friendly" and "natural" aspects: Overall, not really impressed for several reasons. 1. While I appreciate the use of pasture land for growing the sugar cane used in making the bottles (so no deforestation), I question the long-term sustainability of using a food crop to make plastic. We've seen from the use of corn-derived ethanol in this country the impact that has been made on food prices. There's no way this would be viable as an overall trend, and if it's just one product in one manufacturer's line, it seems like it's just a token change. 2. The ingredients are not very natural, there are as many or more unnatural chemicals in this shampoo as there are in any other shampoo I've used. Adding a few naturally-derived ingredients to something doesn't make it natural. 3. 100% recyclable except for the cap? Since caps are much denser than bottles, I wonder about the true percentage of the total package that is recyclable. 4. "Up to 59%" from sugarcane? Logically speaking, that could be anything from 1% to 59%. I'd rather see something like "at least 40% from sugarcane," or "40% to 59%" from sugarcane, or whatever the real deal is. I'm tired of reading between the lines. 5. Truthfully, I'd like to see a company step away from the whole, "must have brand new fancy package every time" model of marketing. I realize there are probably all kinds of logistical problems associated with going to, say, reusable glass bottles or even reusable plastic bottles, but the truth is that when we continually make new stuff (even if it's from recycled materials---notice most new things from recycled materials are not from 100% recycled materials anyway), we continually use energy and raw materials. We live in a "throw away" society and that's simply not indefinitely sustainable. I would love to see a shampoo company move towards providing "refills" in a truly biodegradable packaging that I could use to refill a bottle I already have, for instance. And a product that is truly natural and won't contaminate groundwater as the refill packaging DOES biodegrade. ;0)