Shespeaks Logo
Login    Join SheSpeaks
 
Home  |  FAQs  |  Contact  |  Working with SheSpeaks
 
BLOG CATEGORIES
All Things that Inspire Women Who Inspire Causes We Care About Health/Wellness Books We Love What's Going on At SheSpeaks?
Keeping It Hush Hush
Posted February 4, 2010

People who have dogs, especially in apartment buildings where walls may be thin and living quarters small, often receive complaints about their dogs barking at all hours of the day and night.  Sometimes these complaints go beyond a knock at the door and are filed with the landlord, co-op board, or worse - the city.  When this happens, the pet owner is often faced with a couple of options: they can move out and possibly face the same issues at the next place of residence or they can give their dog up and deal with the possibility of having it euthanized at the pound if they can’t find someone willing to take in a "loud" dog. 

For some, neither of these options are palatable and they end up going in for a very unconventional solution.  A recent article from the New York Times talks about a surgery performed on dogs that has a lot of animal activists up in arms.  Debarking, the procedure to remove a dog’s vocal chords, is not widely practiced but has found it’s place in bigger cities where apartment dwellers receive more complaints about barking dogs.

Though many veterinarians refuse to perform this procedure, finding it inhumane, there are still a good number who do (though often times will not advertise this unless asked about it).  One San Diego veterinarian, Dr. Sharon Vanderlip, calls herself a big proponent of the debarking surgery.  Vanderlip has been performing this type of surgery for 30 years and defends the practice by saying, "They recover immediately and they don’t ever seem to notice any difference.  I think that in certain cases it can certainly save a dog from ending up being euthanized.  If properly done, they behave totally the same afterwards and don’t seem to have any health problems." 

The surgery is described as relatively simple.  The veterinarian will cut the vocal cords through the mouth or an incision in the larnyx .  All that’s left of the dog’s bark after the surgery will be a quiet muffled sort of sound.  But there is a potential side effect to this procedure that has a lot of dog lovers and veterinarians saying it is inhumane and harmful for a dog.  Dr. Gary Ellison, from the University of Florida College of Veterinary Medicine, warns that in the past he has had to operate on debarked dogs who suffer from breathing difficulties after scar tissue built up in their throats.

What do you think of debarking surgery?

Do you think there is ever an instance where performing this procedure could be beneficial to the dog?

32 Comments
lovebeingamommy says: February 04, 2010 01:58 AM
Ouch! Poor puppies. I have 2 dogs and I would never dream of doing such a thing. There is such a thing as a dog trainer...
amare57 says: February 04, 2010 03:44 AM
What a terrible idea! If dogs weren't meant to bark, then they wouldn't. A dogs bark can be a miracle...we've all heard of people who were woken up in the middle of the night by their dogs to be warned of a fire in the house. Maybe we should test this on humans and see how people feel about not being able to verbally express themselves...
carash13 says: February 04, 2010 08:00 AM
People who would even think of such a procedure for their dog, should not be allowed to own a dog. They should buy a fish instead. These are the kind of people who leave their dogs to die in shelters because they can't simply train their dog or educate themselves before making such a commitment to another living being with feelings. The only time this would be beneficial would be if the dog has an infection or tumor of some sort in the vocal chords, larynx, etc.. , but on an otherwise healthy dog? .... ABSOLUTELY NOT!
CrystalBurgard says: February 04, 2010 09:26 AM
Debarking surgery = animal abuse!!! Anyone who would even consider such a thing, solely to shut their dog up, should have their dog taken away from them as they are irresponsible pet owners and dont deserve a dog. And the vets who do this should have their license revoked. If, there was some real medical reason why it should be done, then fine. But to do it to keep an animal quiet is downright wrong. And I totally agree with amare57 " Maybe we should test this on humans and see how people feel about not being able to verbally express themselves..." LOVE IT!! Perhaps the owners should have to have this done to them if they elect to have this done to their dog for no medical reason
summitqwestcomp says: February 04, 2010 10:43 AM
I think that this is a horrible idea! I agree with this being animal abuse!! I don't think in any way that this is beneficial to a dog. People should think about the responsibilities of getting dog before they actually go out and buy one so that this type of situation never happens in the first place.
bourmanfamily says: February 04, 2010 02:23 PM
I think its a bad idea to debark a dog. I understand people want to keep their dogs but there are those anti-bark trainers. I think its just a way for people to have designer dogs without all the fuss of dealing with a dog that barks and this way they don't have to take the time to train them.
msfriendly says: February 04, 2010 02:43 PM
I never heard of this before! I think this is terrible and should not be allowed. The dog just need to be trained. People shouldn't have a dog if they are not willing to train, spend time, and love the animal.
krys2000 says: February 04, 2010 04:01 PM
Debarking is a terrible thing that ought not be allowed. Spend time with your dog, train your dog or don't get one!
giesela99 says: February 04, 2010 05:35 PM
This is a "quick fix" to something that could be remedied with behavioral training. This reminds me of the parents and schools who are quick to medicate children for behavior problems without first attempting other modifications for their chidlren.
mardel says: February 04, 2010 06:17 PM
Debarking a dog is such a cruel thing to do to an animal! How can anybody justify this as the only solution to a constant barking of an animal? You took the responsibility to get a pet and now it's your responsibility to train and take care of that pet. We give therapy to sexual predators but why not castrate them instead? Why should we take something natural away like barking from a defenseless animal? People let's deal with bigger issues here please!
k9_crystal says: February 05, 2010 03:54 AM
I am a professional dog trainer. When it comes to someone having to give up their dog- to a humane society or shelter- or getting such a surgery to be able to keep their dog in their current living situation- It is mentally and emotionally easier stress-wise on the dog to stay in it's known environment. I personally would never get this done, but working with people and behavior issues I can understand why it is done even though I do not personally agree- I see it as a LAST resort. Overall, I feel that when getting a dog you should make sure that it is compatible with your lifestyle-- if you're living in an apartment, don't go out and buy/adopt a terrier (notorious for barking)- maybe go for a quieter dog like a Basenji. Putting your best effort forward as a responsible dog owner starts with researching and choosing a dog that can benefit your lifestyle- in turn, your lifestyle benefits your dog- and that's what the dog-human bond is supposed to be about.
MadHatter says: February 05, 2010 10:25 AM
i agree with mardel. i find that if it will be such a problem for the owners, then they should have thought about it before getting a dog. i find this procedure to be inhumane. dogs bark to forewarn you of danger, to scare away perps to think twice before going into your house. why would you want to destroy that? true, dogs do get annoying once in a while when they don't stop barking, but i would never ever dream about doing that to my own 2 dogs. one of my dogs saved our family and the whole house in the middle of the night when our toaster that was plugged into the wall fried out and started a small fire in the kitchen. the smoke detector didn't go off because the battery needed to be changed, but my dog barked its head off and got my parents to go downstairs to see what was going on. a dog barks for a reason.
ddavidso says: February 05, 2010 10:37 AM
I agree with k9-crystal. I am fortunate to have plenty of land around my home because I have 3 dogs and the littlest one barks all the time. If the choice was however was to get the surgery or lose her, I would get her the surgery. I knew what I was getting when I rescued her so no regrets
mardel says: February 05, 2010 08:16 PM
Thanks MadHatter! You made a great point!! Your right a dogs warning bark has saved so many lives!!
HJFinnie says: February 05, 2010 08:28 PM
I had never given much thought on this subject until I met a dog who had this procedure. He visited the dog part where we take our dog. The dog spent a lot of time "barking," but due to complications, he was easily out of breath. His owner had gotten him from a shelter, and was very against the procedure. I could never do this to my dog.
Lusadi says: February 06, 2010 09:57 PM
I don't know. If it was de-bark my dog or lose my dog, I would certainly consider the procedure. I have known several dogs that have had the procedure done and though they sounded a bit strange when barking, it didn't affect them in a negative way. I do not agree that it is animal cruelty. I think it is one of many options that can allow dog and human to live together. My dog has his bark. Fortunately, he uses it sparingly.
amberdana says: February 07, 2010 11:44 AM
I think it is a horrible thing to do. There are people who never seem to shut up and you don't go and see us taking there vocal cords out. That is a dogs voice. Train your dog people. If you don't have time to train your dog don't get one.
eldapc11 says: February 07, 2010 05:07 PM
This is insane. I would never do such thing. People should get a dog trainer instead of paying for a terrible surgery. Or don't get a dog. Dogs should not be in apartments, they need space to run around and be loud.
rulistenin says: February 08, 2010 01:28 PM
A friend of mine adopted a collie that was already debarked. Her dog Rocky had been used for breeding by his original owners. (Sadly, Rocky died about a year ago). When Rocky would try to bark it sounded like someone with a muted sore throat. One day, he was in the gated front yard of my friend's house. Someone walking by heard Rocky barking and called the police, because they thought Rocky was being abused by not getting any water to drink. His bark sounded very dry and hoarse. Of course, all was okay with the police after they came by her house, but my friend was really hurt that someone thought she had been abusing her dog.
Pepperjune says: February 08, 2010 01:37 PM
I worked at a vet clinic for 8 years,and thankfully my vet refused to do this surgery because of how inhumnae it was (he also refused to crop dogs ears because it is vain and inhumane) What people dont understand(which i didnt either till I worlked at the vet clinic) is that the procedure doesnt not make the dog silent,they just have this horrible raspy bark/yip(like rulistenin says above) there are humane ways to treat the animal from barking,also people need to first address WHY is the dog barking in the first place!!??(boredom,loneliness,seperation anxiety)
sweetgirl1 says: February 08, 2010 05:00 PM
This is for rulistenin..... I think your friend did abuse her dog by having it ((debarked))!! How cruel to debark a dog. So sad.
idahospud says: February 09, 2010 12:05 PM
I have dogs & so do my neighbors.My dogs only bark at people comming onto my property.(that is because I taught them & spend time with them.)My neighbors dogs??? They bark at everything,it is really annoying,but it is only because thoese dogs get no training or interaction.I think my neighbors should give their dogs to someone who has time for them.I think its cruel to get a dog and do nothing with it.dogs need people interaction to live a healthy life.De barking a dog is the lazy & irresponsible way out.
DruidessMommy says: February 09, 2010 04:27 PM
If you live in an area where a dog occasionally barking would be a problem then you don't need to have a dog. Dogs bark for a reason. Just like babies cry for a reason. Would you get your infant's vocal cords cut because the crying annoys you or your neighbours?
DruidessMommy says: February 09, 2010 04:29 PM
And to all those people who'd rather get their dog de-barked... just remember that when your smoke alarm fails to go off and your dog tries in vain to wake you with that muffled, scratchy sound from outside your bedroom door..
mardel says: February 09, 2010 09:08 PM
Were is PETA when you need them!! They need to be all over these doctors that perform these kind of procedures!! PETA HELP!!
rulistenin says: February 11, 2010 02:58 PM
This is for sweetgirl1..... if you would have taken the time to actually read what was posted you would have read that my friend ADOPTED (rescued) a dog that someone before her had ((debarked)). READ DETAILS before you slam people!!! It IS cruel to debark a dog. So sad.
sbcbchaffee says: February 11, 2010 06:58 PM
What if we got our vocal chords taken out because we talked too much or at all?????????? Even tho I dont like or use them there are collars for this.
GhostCat says: February 12, 2010 06:55 PM
When I was around 8 I went to this house to sell wrapping paper for girl scouts and what greeted me at the door was a debarked yellow lab. I was terrified and had no idea what was wrong with the dog. I have had a dog my entire life and even at that age I did not agree with what those people did to their dog. I myself have had to do things that I am against in order to save an animals life (I had to declaw my cat in order for her to come with me and not be taken to the shelter and most likely killed because of her age when i moved to an apt). But i would NEVER have this done to an animal. Like it says in a previous post, there is a such thing as a dog trainer. Behavior problems can be fixed with enough time and love. I cannot understand why anyone would do this to their pet.
eisheth says: February 17, 2010 03:12 AM
That is pure EVIL!! It is cruel and wrong and needs to be against the law. It's animal cruelty weather people want to admit it or not. It's completely unnecessary and when you adopt a pet you know what your getting in to. If you do not want to listen to a dog bark then DO NOT get a dog. If you live where a dog is forbidden to bark then DO NOT get a dog. How can anyone justify mutilating an animal for such a selfish, petty, and simply ridiculous reason? And that so called veterinarian needs to lose her job. I would not take my pets to a vet that would perform such a horrendous procedure on an animal. The same goes for de-clawing. You know that cats scratch so if that is going to be a problem for you then DO NOT adopt a cat.
eisheth says: February 17, 2010 03:12 AM
I mean If their kid wont stop yelling would they render him/her silent by removing their voice box? or if the child will not keep their little fingers off stuff would they cut off the kids fingers? NO they wouldn't, why? Because it is INHUMANE just like it is when doing it to an animal.
eisheth says: February 17, 2010 03:13 AM
I seen a few people have commented talking about PETA, and I would just like to inform every one that PETA kills more pets then your local animal control and at least the pets at animal control are given a chance to be claimed by their owner or adopted. PETA killes more then 90% of the animals they take in most of which do not even make it to the shelter, they are executed in their van promptly upon being picked up. They are not given a chance to be adopted out or be claimed by their owner. PETA does NOT care about animals, They kill for convenience. You can go to PeatKillsAnimals.com and to Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (PETA headquarters is located in Norfolk Virginia) website in their public records, to verify what I have told you about PETA.
cybrown551 says: February 24, 2010 06:24 PM
I'm not sure about this one. I have pretty mixed emotions on this subject. I have a dog who barks but I don't mind because I live in a house. But I really not like to see the owners have to give up their dogs because of the complaints. And on the other hand to keep the dog they have to get this surgery done to the dog. I just don't know. I want to see the owners keep their dog and I'm sure that the dog would like to stay with the owners. So I don't know.
To comment, please 
 or